The consumption of the construction industry in numbers is impressive: more than 50 percent of the existing CO2 emissions, up to 50 percent of energy consumption, the utilization of up to 50 percent of available raw materials, and 50 to 60 percent of waste (nationwide in Germany). This was revealed by Stefanie Weidner, Head of Sustainability Strategies at the office of Werner Sobek, during the 10th Symposium on Alpine Construction. The international office of Werner Sobek is known for its focus on the design and planning of structures, facades, and technical building equipment, as well as sustainable engineering and design. A paradigm shift in the construction industry is necessary because legislatively mandated measures fall far short of achieving the emission reductions necessary for climate goals (broken down proportionally for Germany in their examples). This applies to the clients, the planners, and the implementers. The goal is to reuse the materials dormant in existing structures. In Austria, according to Sonja Zumpfe of BauKarussell, this amounts to 2 billion tons of valuable materials, growing by about 9 tons per capita per year.
There are solutions, but legislation needs to catch up.
However, both in terms of planning and the construction industry, they are already ahead of the legal framework. A multitude of norms establish requirements that significantly increase the amount of resources and hinder the reuse of materials in the context of the circular economy. For this reason, the Bavarian Chamber of Architects, represented at the symposium by architect and board member Rainer Post, calls for a new building type “e”. The “e” stands for simple (“einfach” in German) and experimental and is not intended to replace the existing classes of building regulations in Bavaria but to complement them. In practice, this means reducing buildings to the core of safety objectives (structural stability, fire protection, healthy living conditions, and environmental protection) and abandoning compliance with more extensive norms. For example, it should be possible to design plug, screw, or clamp connections and thus avoid the more environmentally harmful and less recyclable gluing – a practice dictated by norms in certain areas (such as sealing norms), according to Post. Liability issues are also not irrelevant. For instance, one cannot remove a fire door from one building and install it in another. Guarantees and liabilities are by no means clarified in this regard.
This issue is also addressed by Christine Itzlinger-Nagl, Head of the Department for Planning, Construction, and Housing at the State of Salzburg. Work is underway on the new Housing Promotion Act, which is expected to come into effect in early 2025. She confirms the statements of her predecessors that the building code is more of a “new construction” code and provides too few options for the valuable utilization of existing structures. Building in existing structures is not as well supported as building on greenfield sites. This is expected to change with the new law.